|
|
![]()
PRIVATE USES OF EDUCATION WINNING OUT, WRITERS TOLD
By Anne C. Lewis for America Tomorrow |
Anne C. Lewis Related Web Information: ![]() Education Writers Association Web Site |
WASHINGTON, DC--Americans have always been uncertain about their goals for public education, but the strength of the most popular current theme--that it is a private good--threatens to create a real imbalance, education writers were told here last week.
The trend toward private purposes for education, as in choice,
charters, and vouchers, is accelerating, historian David Labaree of
Michigan State University told the Education Writers Association at
its annual seminar. This goal, he said, makes it seem "more
important to get ahead than to get an education."
Up through the end of the 19th century, the dominant theme in
American education was one of democratic equality. This produced
the common school, where "all children were to learn to think, act
on shared values, and where social differences could be reduced,"
Labaree noted. This resulted in neighborhood schools, the
comprehensive high school, social promotion, and a strong emphasis
upon inclusion.
A second theme, that emerged in the early part of this
century, stressed social efficiency and the economic benefits of
education. The emphasis shifted from general education to specific
skills and resulted in vocational education tracking, and an
emphasis on efficiency.
The third theme, education as a private good, focuses "not on
what education can do for society or on what it can do for the
economy, but what it can do for me," Labaree said.
In fact, said the historian, Americans want the education
system to accomplish all three of these goals, and the conflict
among them "has made it impossible to accomplish any of them
efficiently." He added that the bureaucracy of school systems has
prevented the "private good" theme from taking over, even if it has
its own problems, but he believes the balance is tipping in favor
of the private good. However, Americans have always regarded
education as a pillar of society, and he does not think they are
willing to drive the democratic purpose out of the education
system.
For Howard Fuller, former superintendent in Milwaukee and a
strong proponent of vouchers, his support of vouchers is not anti-democratic "but the opposite." He told the seminar that "it is not
a question of whether or not parents have choice in education, but
who has choice." Poor parents in Milwaukee need to have the
opportunity to leave schools that fail their children just like
white parents, he said. The academic gap between black and white
students is growing, Fuller said, and drastic actions are needed
"as long as America does not have the political will to do what we
know we need to do."
The past goals and present failures of the education system
may shrink in importance if the predictions of futurist Jennifer
Jarratt come true. Technology is going to erase "schools as we
know them," she told the seminar, and the distinctions between what
schools do and what other educating influences do will blur.
Eventually, she said, brain research will lead to "a lot of social
engineering or brain design" that will change what and how people
learn.
Return to Home Page © 1997 America Tomorrow, Inc. Page created May 11, 1997 |