|
|
![]()
READING CAMPAIGN: MISDIRECTED?
By Anne C. Lewis for America Tomorrow |
Anne C. Lewis Related Web Information: ![]() Education Writers Association Web Site |
WASHINGTON, D.C.--The Clinton Administration's campaign to ensure all children are reading by the end of the third grade is the right issue but not the right strategy, some experts told education writers at their annual seminar here.
"If we can't get to kids by the third grade, they are going
to be lousy readers for the rest of their lives," Reid Lyon,
cheif of research on learning disabilities at the National
Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD), told the
reporters. His branch's recent longitudinal report on how
children learn to read confirmed the importance of emphasizing
the early grades, he said.
Reading problems show up in the first grade, agreed Robert
Slavin of The Johns Hopkins University, whose Success for All
reading program is used in hundreds of low-income schools around
the country. High-income families get immediate help for their
children, but "there is no rescue for poor children," he said.
Slavin said ensuring children are reading by age nine is "a
noble goal that could be attained if we put all energies to it."
He likened the campaign to President Kennedy's call to put a man
on the moon, "but he didn't ask for volunteer scientists to do
it," he pointed out. The strategy may be good for volunteers and
help some children, but the basic solution for the 4.8 million
children who are failing at reading "is to change what is going
on between children and teachers in grades K-3."
All of the panelists discussing the great "reading debate"
at the Education Writers Association seminar agreed that teacher
knowledge about how children learn to read is essential. If they
were well prepared, the debate between phonics and whole language
might not be so important, they said.
Teachers waver on phonics, said Marilyn Adams of Harvard
University, because half of the children in the primary grades
"absolutely get it" when it comes to learning to read, "and the
other half don't and are totally bored by phonics approaches."
Lyon said the polarization between the two different strategies
for teaching reading "is hurting kids" because it hides the
research base which says certain conditions must exist in order
to learn to read. Teachers are able to handle methods, but they
are at a loss when reading does not come easily to children, he
said.
Teachers need to be well-informed about how children learn
to read, he said. This includes the critical awareness of sounds
of language, the ability to process sounds that are heard, word
recognition, and converting alphabetic print into sounds and
messages. Reading is something that is learned and does not come
as easily as speech, Lyon's research emphasizes, and relies on
how children hear and manipulate sounds even before they see the
printed word. Poor readers need explicit instruction, but also
need to use interesting material to develop sound recognition,
which is where whole language can be helpful, he said.
The complexity of learning to read is why "we need a massive
retooling of teacher preparation and development," Slavin
stressed. He said Title I was not being used effectively in
elementary schools because its resources should be focused on
classroom teachers in the first few grades, not spread around and
dependent on specialists.
Return to Home Page © 1997 America Tomorrow, Inc. Page created May 11, 1997 |