|
|
![]()
CHANGES AHEAD IN TEACHING?
By Anne C. Lewis for America Tomorrow |
Anne C. Lewis Related Web Information: ![]() Education Writers Association Web Site |
WASHNGTON, D.C.--The current wave of education reform depends on teachers with excellent skills, but American education has never required them, and the public often expresses disappointment with teachers because of their unions. Are either of these conditions going to change?
Apparently hope is in the wind, according to experts
appearing before the annual seminar of the Education Writers
Association. Teaching is transforming, and so are the unions.
"We used to say that teaching consisted of delivering
information, giving a test, and giving a grade," Linda Darling
Hammond told the education reporters. "Now, we are asking them
to do much more. Direct instruction is useful for achieving good
scores on low-level basic skills tests, but "indirect instruction
that emphasizes higher order learning is harder to do and often
badly done. Teachers rarely have had the preparation to do it
well."
However, teacher preparation, licensing, and professional
development are being brought into alignment with standards-based
reforms, Darling Hammond said. The recent report of the National
Commission on Teaching & America's Future, "What Matters Most,"
has spurred at least 12 states to adopt its comprehensive reforms
based on standards. A professor at Teachers College/Columbia
University and executive director of the Commission, she praised
five-year preparation programs, calling traditional pre-service
programs mostly "cash cows for campuses." The National Board for
Professional Teaching Standards also is having a critical impact
on standards throughout a teacher's career, she said.
To complete the transformation, teacher unions need to
advocate for standards and organize around schools, not
districts, Julia Koppich, co-author of a new report on teacher
unions, told the reporters. She and Charles Kerchner in "United
Mind Workers: Unions and Teaching in the Knowledge Society" also
recommend that teacher unions adopt a craft rather than
industrial model. This means unions would support electronic
"hiring halls" that allow teachers to switch jobs more easily,
portable pensions and benefits, and career ladders that begin as
apprenticeships and advance to lead/master teacher positions.
Some of their ideas already are underway, responded Robert
Chase, president of the National Education Association. In
speeches and statements since he took over the largest of the two
major unions last summer, Chase has promoted "a new vision of
unionism" that focuses on quality student learning. "Collective
bargaining can be the mother of reinvention," he assured the
reporters. As an example, he said the NEA executive board had
just approved a resolution encouraging local units to adopt peer
assistance and peer review plans, a form of teacher
accountability used in Rochester, Columbus (Ohio) and other
districts.
Not reassured by his statements was Chester Finn, Jr., of
the Thomas Fordham Foundation, a frequent critic of teacher
unions, especially because of their lukewarm if not negative
attitudes toward charter schools. He said that teacher unions
still represent "the big, classic industrial model that serves
the interests of members and not customers and are impervious to
change. The unions "say one thing in Washington and then do
something else around the country," Finn charged.
Chase said NEA units have started their own charter schools
and that the union wants standards for charters because "if they
do not pay attention to good data and insight, they will become
the fad that has to be corrected in five years."
Return to Home Page © 1997 America Tomorrow, Inc. Page created May 11, 1997 |