|
|
![]()
IF MONEY GOES TO REDUCE CLASS SIZE, THEN IT MAKES A DIFFERENCE
By Anne C. Lewis for America Tomorrow |
Anne C. Lewis Related Web Information: ETS Web Site |
PRINCETON, N.J.--Some critics of public schools insist that more money would make no difference, but a new study from the Educational Testing Service indicates money does improve student achievement--if it is spent on reducing class size.
Researcher Harold Wenglinsky analyzed data from several
sources to determine how district monies were allocated for math
instruction in fourth grade in more than 200 districts and for
eighth grade in more than 180 districts. In both grades,
spending money on instruction improved teacher-student ratios,
which in turn increased student achievement. The largest effects
of reduced class size came in schools serving low-income
students.
On the other hand, spending on capital outlays, school-level
administration and teacher education levels were not found to be
related to student achievement levels. It should be pointed out
that teacher education level refers to traditional advanced-degree attainment, not to professional development.
Wenglinsky also found that expenditures per pupil on
administration is greater at the school level than at the
district level. This is contrary to the perception that district
administration costs are "top heavy." Expenditures on district
administration, he says, translate into smaller class sizes at
the school level.
"When Money Matters" is available for $9.50 prepaid from the
ETS Policy Information Center, Rosedale Road, Princeton, NJ
08541-001.
Return to Home Page © 1997 America Tomorrow, Inc. Page created May 30, 1997 |