|
|
![]()
GOT STANDARDS? NOW COMES THE HARD PART
By Anne C. Lewis for America Tomorrow |
Anne C. Lewis Related Web Information: ECS Web Site |
PROVIDENCE--Most states are well into setting or developing
much higher content standards for students and wondering what to do
next to keep the school reform momentum going.
The policy angles are clear to Luther Williams, who heads
education and human resources programs at the National Science
Foundation. He told an opening panel at the annual Education
Commission of the States meeting that implementation requires a set
of coherent policies that cover appropriate curriculum materials,
professional development, the use of technology and assessment. The
goal, he said, is to have "a minimum difference between what is
stipulated in the standards and what is done in the classroom."
That's all well and good, but down at the classroom level the
implementation is not all that simple, other panelists said. "You
can have all the policies in place but without a visual
understanding of what standards is in the classrooom, the policies
won't work," said Kate Nolan, who helped develop New Standards
assessments and has been working with instructional issues in
Philadelphia. The solution in Philadelphia, she said, was to use
selections of student work to give teachers an idea of what
standards should look like. The selections "may stink," she said,
"but you have to get principals and teachers to the point where
they know that and will say the student work stinks."
One reason why teachers need to grapple with standards in the
context of classroom work is that few feel "ownership" over
standards, Nolan said. Only a handful of teachers in a building or
even a district actually help develop them. By deciding if student
work comes up to standards, teachers see that they are teaching
parts of them and they begin to share and discuss with other
teachers. "They're not going to learn this by reading standards
books," Nolan said emphatically.
The Cincinnati schools used state standards, then restructured
schools to make it possible for students to reach the standards.
Kathleen Ware, director of quality improvement for the Cincinnati
schools, described that district's newly adopted redesign plan that
gives teachers authority to make decisions on resources within the
building, including hiring of support staff. It was a struggle to
get the plan approved, she said, but it was necessary to empower
teachers. They will decide, for example, if they need librarians,
counselors and other staff. Teachers also will work in teams with
the same group of students, preparing them for key times when
assessments will determine if students have met standards--at the
end of the 3rd, 5th, and 8th grades.
Nolan acknowledged that "we have huge numbers of people in
classrooms who are not lovers of learning," but, she said, "we also
don't have people standing in line to replace them. We have to
work with what we have." In Cincinnati, the random professional
development system is being reined in, according to Ware, and "the
district will provide monies only for staff development that we say
is focused on content."
Asked to cite places where cohesive implementation of
standards is underway, Williams named the Commonwealth of Puerto
Rico, El Paso as well as state policies in Texas, Colorado's state
reference points for standards, and policymaking in Massachusetts
that is addressing the problems of tracking and the lack of
graduation requirements.
Williams also said that in the last 25 years public education
has not come up with anything significantly new, but the movement
for standards that all students must meet is new. He also said the
country's ambitious goals are doable. "We have no evidence that
says the kids can't do the work," he emphasized.
Return to Home Page © 1997 America Tomorrow, Inc. Page created July 13, 1997 |